About Me

Name: Jamaal Long
Email: mavericknews@yahoo.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Magic Mulatto in Empty Suit Makes Empty Promises

Hope? Nope
By Jamaal Long

He voted for reauthorization of the Patriot Act. He voted for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) law giving retroactive immunity to telecommunication companies for breaking the law. Out 130 members of the House and 23 members in the Senate who voted against the war, he picked a bunch of loony liberal war hawks to join him in the White House.

This raises a question for those of us who have not drank the Kool-Aid made with fluoride water.

What Change?

Even before Barack Obama became president-elect he has been talking out both sides of his mouth. While campaigning as the candidate for change his action, particularly how he votes, has indicated what we can really expect from an Obama administration.

Because people living in the United States of Amnesia remember less than nothing before Monday morning, except who won the football game on Sunday, they are unaware of Andrew Jackson’s farewell address warning about some of the plans Obama has for the country.
 
In his farewell address, Jackson explains what would happen if taxes were directed to the States for making improvements on infrastructure.
 
“. . .the Federal Government can not be permitted to employ its income in internal improvements, efforts will be made to seduce and mislead the citizens of the several States by holding out to them the deceitful prospect of benefits. . . and should [they] indulge in lavish expenditures exceeding their resources, they will before long find themselves oppressed with debts which they are unable to pay. . . . Do not allow yourselves, my fellow-citizens, to be misled on this subject. It is, moreover, a system of injustice, and if persisted it will inevitably lead to corruption, and must end in ruin. The surplus revenue will be drawn from the pockets of the peoplefrom the farmer, the mechanic, and the laboring classes of society; but who will receive it when distributed among the States . . ? It will certainly not be returned to those who paid it and who have most need of it and are honestly entitled to it.”


Under Executive Order 12803 these public structures that Obama plans to build are up for sale. Which includes: roads, tunnels, bridges, electricity supply facilities, mass transit, rail transportation, airports, ports, waterways, water supply facilities, recycling and wastewater treatment facilities, solid waste disposal facilities, housing, schools, prisons, and hospitals.

This is how the foreign countries will be repaid after the dollars collapses.


This is how it works. Because the dollar is no longer attractive to even China, America won’t be able borrow money from other countries in order to pay for these projects. The Federal Government doesn’t collect enough taxes from its citizens to be self-sufficient and finance these projects, either.

So, the only alternative would be to turn to the private Federal Reserve Bank to print the money.

Here’s the problem. In order for prices to be stable, the money would need to be printed in direct proportion to the goods and services being produce other wise it will force the dollar to drop in value and prices to inflate to soak up all the excess money in the economy.

If the dollar continues to get weaker because of hyperinflation, then, just like Iceland our economy will melt and we will be on IMF and World Bank loans. The IMF and World Bank are criminal institutions that are notorious for imposing loan conditions that require countries to cut spending on education, nutrition and health care for lower 60 percent of income earners.

Even though the dollar would be worthless at that point America would still be obligated to pay its debt, the public infrastructure would need to be privatized and turned over to whomever this country has contracted debt with as collateral.

The other problem is that money would need to be paid back to the Federal Reserve as well. It is called a Federal Reserve “note” for a reason. A note by definition is an instrument of debt. The interest on that debt could very well amount to as much as the principle.

This is what Andrew Jackson was trying to warn against because his principles were rooted in the ideology of Republican form of government representative of people with everyone’s interest in mind.


Obama’s principles are rooted in what he learned as little Obammy sitting on the knee of his commie mommy.

For those that want the State to nanny up and breast-feed them from cradle to grave, Obama has other plans. Rewarding those that who fleece his sheeple.

He awarded the investment bankers, many who donated to his campaign, $700 billion despite evidence of widespread predatory lending in which people of color bore the brunt end of that financial fiasco. Blacks made up of 55 percent of sub-prime loans and within eight years lost $164 billion and $213 billion.

In a daring move, apparently believing that the Obama zombies wouldn’t notice he makes Penny Pritzker national finance chair of his presidential campaign. Pritzker is credited for being the creator of the mortgage-backed securities, which comprises of all those sub-prime loans. She also had to pay out $460 million for—I kid you not, predatory lending.

Many will not wake up to the realities of this man until they are homeless and living off one bowl of oatmeal a day from a soup kitchen. When that time comes the more appropriate question will be asked with one arm extended forward frailly clasping a Styrofoam cup and looking with sad puppy dog eyes at you fellow vagrant American as you ask him:

Got change?  


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel's Savage Attack on the Sabbath

State-backed terrorism back fires
By Jamaal Long

 
Beit Hanoun, an area near northern Gaza Strip, has been a launching ground for cross-border rockets. It is from this location that rockets have claimed the lives of two sisters while they were taking out the trash.

Across the border in Ashdod an Israeli woman darts from her car in search of shelter after hearing a siren sound. As she was making her get away, she tripped and fell in street and was killed by a rocket.

The three victims are related not only because they were senselessly murdered, but also because they are victims of their States’ foreign policy plans that involves supporting groups that the States now have to protect them from.

“The student of history may at this point note that during the 1970s and much of the 1980s, Israeli defense officials, keen to foster a faith-based counterweight to the Marxist ideology of hardline armed groups such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, quietly but crucially aided the leaders of the Gaza branch of the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood - a group which, six days after the eruption of the first Palestinian uprising, was to found the Islamic Resistance Movement, whose acronym was Hamas," Haaertz.com    
reported

To take on their opposition in other countries, States have found it convenient to eliminate their enemies by proxy, even if it means supporting violent radical groups.  In the case of Middle Eastern violence that the post-9-11-generation is all too aware of, it is not just a simple case of “them bad us good.”

The groups that we see today, Hamas in particular, was born out of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was started in the 1920s under British colonial rule. The American Conservative reported that the Muslim Brotherhood was set up in order to keep the Egyptian nationalism and anti-colonialism under wraps.
 
They also went on to report that Robert Dreyfuss author of Devil’s Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam, described the original Muslim Brotherhood as an “unabashed British intelligence front.” Even their mosque that served as their first headquarter in Ismailia, Egypt, was built by the (British) Suez Canal Company.


In 1954, Gamal Abdel Nasser became the second President of Egypt. Nasser encouraged anti-colonial and pan-Arab revolutions and took part in the founding of Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)
.


Israel, like the British, was also interested in keeping Arab nationalism in line, so 1967 Muslim Brotherhood activist were freed from Egyptian prison after the Brotherhood tried to assassinate Nasser. One of the men freed was Ahmed Yassin—founder of Hamas.


That same year concluded the Six Day War and Israel began managing the West Bank, Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula and urged the recently freed Brotherhood activists to establish themselves in Palestinian society.

The Islamic Association was set up 1973 by Ahmed Yassin, and according to The American Conservative, was licensed by Israel 10 years earlier. The Executive Intelligence Review reported that former Ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer was reported to have said that it was Israel’s idea to promote the “Islamic Movement.”

Kurtzer said when the Islamic movement began to take off, "Israel perceived it to be better to have people turning toward religion rather than toward a nationalistic cause [the Palestinian Liberation Organization—ed.]."

Hamas, Harafat al-Muqawama Al-Islamiyya, or Islamic Resistance Movement began in 1987, and between Ahmed Yassin’s release in 1967 to Hamas’s beginning, the number of mosques tripled from 200 to 600.

According to the Executive Intelligence Review, former Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir and Yitzhak Rabin admitted, in the presence of Egyptian President Muhammad Hosni Mubarak, to giving money to these mosques.

Martha Kessler, a senior analyst for the
CIA, said, “[W]e saw Israel cultivate Islam as a counterweight to Palestinian nationalism.”


AMERICA JOINS THE FRAY AND FUELS THE FLAMES

The United States supplies more than $2 billion a year in military aid to Israel. That blood money allows Israel to purchase bunker-buster-missiles, called GBU-39, which is then used to continue to kill off more Palestinians

In what would under normal circumstances seem like a blatant double cross, the US and Israel intelligence has been arming Fatah the largest faction of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to now neutralize Hamas.

Abu Abdullah, a senior member of Hamas' military wing, told World Net Daily Hamas estimates they obtained at least $400 million worth of American weapons and equipment.

Like pawns in a chess game, the US and Israeli intelligence agency have been playing both sides against each other, and with the help of US officials and the media have put out disinformation to justify aggression with Palestine.

President-elect Barack Obama in an interview July 2008, told the The New York Times that Hamas is “a group that is not representative of a nation state” and they need make a decision if it is a “serious political party seeking to represent the aspirations of the Palestinian people.”

Due to Obama’s convenient ignorance, he neglected to mention that, in Jan. 2006, Hamas won 76 of the 132 parliamentary seats, which would make them a representation of the Palestinians. He continued by stating that Hamas should “renounce violence as a tool to achieve its aims.

He should have included the same for Israel who uses Palestinians to pose as operatives of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda terrorist network. Once the collaborators working with Israel were caught one of them admitted the plan was to "discredit the Palestinian people, justify every Israeli crime and provide reasons to carry out a new (military) aggression in the Gaza Strip."

While White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe declares that Hamas has shown its "true colors as a terrorist organization, he will never talk about its true origins or a how American and Israel intelligence have used them when it was useful for them
.

Soon the young family members of the murdered Israel woman from Ashdod and the two murdered sisters from Beit Hanoun will be grown. They will be reared in an atmosphere where they have to be wary of cross-border rockets and constant threat of invasion. Soon it will be time for them to pick up weapons of their own and take revenge.

By then, the reasons behind their countries feuding won’t even be remembered
.  





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »