About Me

Name: Jamaal Long
Email: mavericknews@yahoo.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Mujahedeen Makes Major Moves in Afghanistan

Cashing in on Corruption and Political Connections                                                               By Jamaal Long

 

The dark shades the Marine wore masked the sun from his eyes. Despite being unable to see any discernible facial expressions that would betray what mood he may be in, his resolute stature and the irritable tone in his voice said it plainly: the soldiers he had been sent to train were not getting it, and he was losing his cool.

An Afghan soldier was at the mercy of the Marine’s wrath as he stood before him; his voice thundered at him. The Marine raised his arm and thrust forward his index finger, piercing through the air to rebuff the soldier like a schoolteacher does a disobedient child.

“How is he ready?” he demanded. The translator quickly interpreted for him. The Marine’s tone was incredulous. Here was a soldier the US Marine was sent to train in order for the Afghan army to rise up and take on fearsome enemies like the Taliban and other militants. And yet, the soldier he was addressing did not have any of his gear.  He didn’t even have a weapon.

“Ready would be on the road. Staged. Ready to move at 8:30,” the Marine declared. Then, as if becoming frustrated with the translator, he barks out his final command before the translator could finish interpreting. “Come on! Let’s go!”

The Marine is one of the several Embedded Tactical Trainers (ETT) sent to train the Afghan National Army. The number of trainers in Afghanistan has increased by 4,000 bringing the total troop level to 68,000. The ultimate goal of the Afghan Ministry of Defense is for the Afghan National Army to amass a force of 260,000 troops. It is the task of the ETT to make sure that once this goal is reached, the Afghan National Army can take control and defend the country.

Building a seasoned corps of experts and sending them to Afghanistan is considered a high priority. Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has raised awareness to the issue, and senior officers familiar with the matter have cited too few volunteers as part of the trouble.

With too few experts and the “lack of adequate preparation time” before being deployed to Afghanistan, coupled with the “absence of cultural awareness and understanding of the specific tribal and governance situation,” Afghanistan is seeing the return of old Cold War fighters.

Despite the lack of volunteers on the United States’ part, Afghanistan is still able to recruit volunteers. To the dismay of many of those familiar with United States tumultuous history in Afghanistan—which involved the United States being on “intimate terms” with extremists including sending weapons to the Taliban to fight the Soviet Union—this new strategy should feel like a case of déjà vu.

When the security in the Kunduz province declined, the governor and the intelligence community moved quickly to correct the problem. They needed a group with experience that the US grappled to obtain. So they called on the mujahedeen.

Robert Dryfuss, in his book Devil’s Game: How the United States Unleashed Fundamentalist Islam, wrote that mujahedeen were trained by the Green Berets and the US Navy SEALs in US facilities on the East Coast under the oversight of Zbigniew Brzezinski—who is currently President Barack Obama’s foreign policy adviser.

Their training consisted of automatic weapons, timer and explosive, and remote-control devices for triggering mines and bombs. Some of the volunteers later became foot soldiers for Al-Qaeda. One of the volunteers included Osama bin Laden.

When the Soviets pulled out of Afghanistan, all that was left was the mujahedeen—who had a gruesome way of dealing with its opposition. They would “torture their victims by first cutting off their noses, ears and genitals, then removing one slice of skin after another.”  

The Taliban was able to repel the warlords with the leadership of Mullah Omar in September 1996.

The Taliban, however, did leave one social ill in particular to bear its mark of irrevocable despair from Afghanistan to the cities in the United States—facilitated in part by CIA—and its residual effects can still be seen to this day. It is the opium trade. It was and still is a booming market.

The Taliban did not move immediately to ban poppy cultivation; they even collected a 20 percent zakat tax.  Finally, after the Taliban did take action, American narcotics agents were stunned. The crop had been completely wiped out in less than a year. It was an amazing feat seeing how in 2006 Afghanistan accounted for 90 percent of the world’s supply of opium.

The complete eradication of opium came at a cost to the farmers who had to grow crops such as wheat instead. In the lucrative business of opium, farmers got their cash up-front; with crops like wheat, farmers don’t get paid until their crops are sold.

With the Taliban removed from power, however, the opium trade is back in full-swing. US policy originally considered it imperative that the crop be purged, now that view has switched gears, and an alternative solution has been decided.

Richard Holbrooke, US Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, said the new policy is to “downgrade crop eradication.”

“We’re going to upgrade our efforts,” Holbrooke said, “to go after the main drug traffickers.”

It may prove to be a daunting task in light of the new revelation—fraught with ever increasing corruption. If Holbrooke wants US policy to reflect the actions it plans to take, then US forces may be obligated, at the very least, to conduct an investigation into allegedly the most connected drug offender in all of the country—the president’s brother: Ahmed Wali Karzai.

Ambitious investigative news reporters have set out themselves to unravel the mystery of the possible CIA connection with Wali Karzai. If what happened to Tom Lasseter, a reporter for McClatchy news, serves as an example it might be an ill-advised decision to press the issue. Lasseter wrote in his report that he was threatened with physical violence after questioning Karzai and he immediately left the country.

Another American connection to heroine has come full circle in Afghanistan. The story began back in 1988 when a man by the name Ahmad Rateb Popal, former mujahedeen member, was charged with conspiring to ship over a kilo of heroine into the United States.

After being released from prison in 1998, Popal teamed up with his brother Rashid Popal—also convicted of heroine smuggling—and they returned to Afghanistan. The circumstances in Afghanistan could prove to be advantageous for the two brothers. Now, the country is ruled by President Hamid Karzai—the Popal’s cousin.

The Popal brothers have recently parlayed their entrepreneurial knowledge they learned from the underground economics of the heroine business to their new venture: security.

The name of the security company is Watan Risk Management. It is the private military arm of Watan Group, a conglomerate involved in telecommunications and logistics.

The company’s senior personnel have all the skills necessary for the undertaking they are engaged in. Its staff consists of ex-British military from Special Services.

In a strange twist of irony, one of Watan’s clients is the US Department of Defense. Watan protects Afghan trucks carrying American supplies from Kabul to Kandahar. It is the warlords’ association with the Taliban that keeps the people and supplies being transported safe. The US is essentially forced to pay a protection racket to the group it is supposed to be fighting against.

“The Army is basically paying the Taliban not to shoot them,” one American executive told the Guardian. “You are paying the people in local areas—some are warlords, some are politicians in the police force—to move your trucks.”

The prices charged produce a lucrative return. NCL Holdings has a $360 million contract for two years from the US military. Millions of dollars paid to the company snakes its way back to the President Karzai’s cousins, the Popal brothers. Hamed Wardak is the chief principal for the company. He is also the son of Afghan defense minister General Rahim Wardak who himself is a former mujahedeen leader.

Shipping US supplies across the country is risky business, especially when companies are banned from arming themselves with anything more than a rifle. The stipulation guarantees the attackers have the upper hand. If it comes down to a confrontation, it will be transporters, armed with AK-47s, against the Tailban, armed with rocket-propelled grenades shooting from 3,000 feet away.

The decision not to pay is met with immediate reprisal. A US-owned firm called the Four Horsemen International opted not to pay. Because of the insolence they showed toward the warlords and insurgents, they are attacked on every mission.

In Baghlan province and Helmand province, eight police officers were killed. Unfortunately for the police, they are targeted more than foreign troops. It is the job of the Embedded Tactical Trainers to prepare the Afghan National Army to defend the innocent against these attacks.

But no such urgency is present among the recruits. Some are dangerously unprepared. Some have no gear. Some have no weapons.

As one Marine noted, even if they were told in advance that an attack was coming at 8:30 in the morning the next day, they would still be drinking tea by 8:29.

He watches his recruits walk down a long, desolate dirt road. He glanced down at the ground in front of him and followed after them.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gaining Ground In Gaza

Will The Goldstone Report Give Palestinians The Justice They Call For?

By Jamaal Long

 

Tramadol is a drug used to reduce physical pain. Like any other drug, taking more than the recommended dose can lead to psychological and physical dependence. It was perhaps the psychological pain Abu Ahmed was hoping to alleviate when he began taking 800mg of the synthetic opioid, 500mg more than what the manufacturers recommend.

“You feel less frightened,” Ahmed told The Independent, a British newspaper. Ahmed is a 45-year-old unemployed Palestinian and a father of 10. He explained how taking Tramadol pills helped him get through Operation Cast Lead in daze.

For many Palestinians, including Ahmed, living in land in constant turmoil, dealing with internal conflict from feuding factions, Hamas, who controls the Gaza strip, and Fatah, who controls the West Bank; plus, economic siege and violent attacks on Hamas leaders by Israeli fighters, drug use has been the gateway out from reality.  

Tramadol is smuggled in through the tunnels from Egypt, and Gaza has seen an increase in supply of Tramadol and mental health professionals told the The Independent that this is way the people of Gaza cope with results of the latest attack from Israel last winter.

The bombs began raining down from planes over Gaza on Dec. 27, 2008, filling the skies with billowing smoke. The traumatic chaos and blood shed that ensued during the three-week campaign in Gaza left another grisly reminder of the constant and impending violence that surrounds the inhabitants of that small strip of land.

But now the billowing smoke has dissipated, the last mortar shell has dropped and tightly squeezed index fingers have eased their pressure from the triggers. Now the actions from the bloody conflict will call into question an inquiry that may never have been considered by passive observers of the Israel-Palestine conflict who get their information from the brief sound bites from their newscast. A question that the Goldstone report raised and the International Courts Justice in Hague would have to answer is: Was Israel guilty of war crimes?

Scrutiny of Israel by the international community is not a commonly discussed topic by reporters in the American press; however, this report marks another instance when the international community has chastised the Israeli government’s action.

One of the main focal points of controversy in Israel-Palestine conflict is in regards to the Israel-occupied territories. After the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel controlled and occupied Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Golan Heights, East Jerusalem, West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

The United Nations Security Council attempted to promote peace in the region and took diplomatic measures toward that aim after the war concluded. The council passed Resolution 242 that called for the withdrawal of Israeli forces and for both states to live peacefully within their boundaries.

Israel, however, tainted its image in the eyes of the international community when it established settlements in the territories it captured. That action officially brought to light the illegality reflected in the policies the Israeli government endorses, especially toward Palestine.     

In response to the settlements in Palestine, General Assembly of the United Nations in 1998 declared them illegal and further stated that it “deplored” Israel’s practices and policies toward the Palestinians and that it violated their human rights.

Even the officials from the European Union and the International Court of Justice are both in agreement and opposed the settlements in the Occupied Territories for its adverse effects to the Peace Process.

Jewish South African former Supreme Court Judge Richard Goldstone’s report brings damaging allegations of actions that took place during Operation Cast Lead that suggest that Israeli soldiers and Hamas should be prosecuted for war crimes.

The Independent reported that the Goldstone report showed that attack on Gaza reflected policies that were geared toward collective punishment. The Independent reported that the Goldstone investigation uncovered:

. . . an overall policy aimed at punishing the Gaza population for its resilience and for its apparent support for Hamas, and possibly with the intent of forcing a change in such support.”

Bloomberg reported that Goldstone’s panel investigation discovered “disproportionate force” in Gaza. Fred Abrahams, a senior Human Rights Watch researcher, said the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) even used white phosphorus over a densely populated area with no regard to making the distinction between civilians and combatants.

Dispute over how many combatants died versus noncombatants has been ongoing with Israeli officials asserting that their actions targeted combatants. To the Israeli officials’ much discontent, B'Tselem Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories investigation confirmed what the Palestinian human rights organizations said that majority of the Palestinians killed in Gaza were not militants, but in fact, civilians.

According to B’Tselem, of the 1,387 Palestinians that were killed, 773 were noncombatants and only 330 were combatants. Of the civilians killed, 320 were minors under the age of 18 and another 109 were women.

Israeli officials have balked at the entire investigation.  They denied such allegations of war crimes and said that IDF acted in accordance with international law.

Israeli officials stated that Operation Cast Lead, the official name for the December 27th attack, was in response to Qassam rockets from Palestinian groups, which, according to B'Tselem, killed 11 Israeli civilians.

The reason cited for the Qassam rockets that were launched from Palestinian groups was because of the blockade imposed by the Israeli government.

Israeli officials protest that the report lacks the valuable insight necessary to understand what Israel has to deal with when it comes to protecting their country. The officials see the report as undermining their response to attacks against their civilian population. 

The foreign ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said the UN mission had “dealt a huge blow to governments seeking to defend their citizens from terror,” and that its conclusions were “so disconnected with realities on the ground that one cannot but wonder on which planet was the Gaza Strip they visited.”

“We are upset and angry,” Gabriela Shalev, Israel’s ambassador to the UN said. “We take all precautions to respect international law.”

Despite the assurance from Israeli officials that the soldiers acted in accordance with international law, the UN Human Rights Council backed the Goldstone report that accuses both Israeli soldiers and Palestinian combatants of war crimes. This means an investigation needs to be conducted by both parties, or they face prosecution.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in an adamant speech early October promised to never allow Israeli leaders or soldiers to stand trial on war crimes charges over their actions during Operation Cast Lead.

The ongoing conflict and the Israeli blockade have left Gaza de-developed according to a UN report. The delays in humanitarian aid have disrupted the livelihoods of the people of Gazaa reality Abu Ahmed knows all too well.


The blockade caused him, like 100,000 other Palestinians in Gaza, to lose his job. Before, Ahmed worked as a driver, but when he lost his job he became overwhelmed with depression and started having headaches. He began taking Tramadol, just one pill a day. But gradually his addiction grew and he began taking more. Before long, he was taking as many as four, and when he could afford it, eight pills a day.


“I tried to get away from it but I couldn’t,” Ahmed explained. “I had a headache, pain in every part of my body. I had to go the bathroom every 10 minutes. I was sweating. Then you take one pill and you feel better of course. When I took it, I felt very relaxed.”

 

“Before the war the situation was so hard. There was no work, plus I had to take care of 11 people, including my wife. All people could do was sit around in the street and drink tea or coffee.”

As time passed, Ahmed turned to Gaza Community Mental Health Program (GCMHP) and with counseling from the group's trained therapists, Ahmed has stopped taking Tramadol. He has even gained his weight back to 187 pounds; up from 128 pounds where he was previously at the height of his addiction.

Still, with high professional standards the psychologist at GCMHP set for themselves they are only able to help a few people in Gaza beat their drug addictions.

Hasan Shaban Zeyada, a senior psychologist for GCMHP believes the contributing factor to the drug addiction is their vulnerability.

“They don't have hope, they cannot do anything for the future. They are disappointed, depressed, helpless and powerless. They can't find a job, they can't plan for the future, or [afford to] get married.”

 

The culmination of the many problems that exist in Gaza and for the Palestinians stem from the same source according to Mr. Zeyada: “the siege, internal division and the war.”


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

“WHO” is Looking After You

UK and US Government Join Forces with Pharmaceutical Companies to Combat Swine Flu, and Raise Concerns about A/H1N1 Procedures

 

By Jamaal Long 


The threat from A/H1N1, a subtype influenza virus commonly referred to as swine flu, drove people who have not contracted the virus to contact the National Health Service Direct (NHS Direct) helpline in England. In July, 52,000 calls were fielded from people frantic about reports that the latest victims to succumb to the new subtype virus were healthy.

Chloe Buckley, six, died July 9th 48 hours after arriving at St Mary's Hospital in Paddington.

That very same day a 64-year-old general practitioner, Dr. Michael Day, who was treating swine flu victims, died.

Several United Kingdom (UK) media sources proclaimed that these cases were the first to die without having underlying health conditions. However, further details that were later released suggested otherwise.

Chloe originally went to the hospital because of a sore throat. MailOnline.com reported that she was misdiagnosed with tonsillitis. The Sun reported that her distraught parents believed that if she received anti-flu medicine at the time she arrived to the hospital she would still be alive.

The comment that The Sun attributed to Chloe’s parents is out of sequence with how the event actually occurred. TimesOnline later put the episode in its proper order.  

Three days after their daughter Chloe died, Michael and Jacinta Buckley were told their daughter contracted the A/H1N1 virus on Sunday. As for the claim that she was misdiagnosed, the results of post-mortem investigation listed the official cause of death as “septic shock” due to a tonsillitis infection caused by streptococcus A bacterium, also called strep throat.

The omitted facts didn’t end there.  The media was claiming that the virus was killing healthy victims. Dr. Day, who was one of those “healthy” victims, had actually suffered a blood clot to the lungs and was known to have heart disease and high blood pressure.

The hasty reporting by the news media that is absent of crucial facts, like the ones just illustrated, is fueling hysteria around the world over a relatively innocuous virus by comparison. The dubious precautions taken by governments raise questions about what people should fear more: the “deadly” pandemic or the deadly propaganda?  

“We do have to remain cautious,” England's chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson told BBC News. “The virus may change or mutate, but as it stands at the moment, it's not a severe illness for most people but some people can get it very severely.”

A regular Influenza virus worldwide is responsible for between 250,000 and 500,000 deaths. The new subtype influenza virus has a 0.5% death rate. Nevertheless, the UK government has organized and equipped itself for a toe-to-toe showdown schedule for this fall to fend off possible mass illnesses that they believe will be caused by the virus.

All this despite the fact that no irrefutable proof has been verified that the subtype influenza A virus causes death. The so-called Swine flu, when it is reported on, is either “known” to have killed or “linked” to killing more than 700 people. All of them had underlying health conditions.

When a patient died in the greater Glasgow area, a Scottish government spokesman stated that the patient had died from underlying health conditions and said the parents requested that no details be released, not even the gender and age.

The UK Ministry of Justice even blocked an inquest into the deaths of two victims alleged to have died from the new H1N1 virus.  A spokeswoman stated that, “There’s no requirement to hold an inquest into a natural death. Deaths from swine flu would be regarded by coroners as natural.” [emphasis added]

In spite of having insufficient information about the virus, the World Health Organization (WHO) is fast-tracking an A/H1N1 vaccine and making it available in Europe at least two months before the US.

The UK is gearing up to vaccinate 60 million people against the virus including health-care workers, children and pregnant women. The European Medicines Agency approved GlaxoSmithKline PLC and the controversial Baxter International Inc. to supply Britain with vaccines.

Enlisting Baxter’s help, by some, would come as an alarm. Especially after the situation that took place in February when a subcontractor in the Czech Republic inoculated ferrets with what was believed to be human H3N2 flu viruses. To their surprise, the ferrets died. The vaccine, as it turns out, was laced with live H5N1—avian flu viruses.

The contaminants were released by Baxter’s Austrian firm Avir Green Hills Biotechnology.  It was then distributed to three sub-contractors in Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany.

The Toronto Sun reported that the mixing process, called reassortment, is one of two ways pandemics are spread. The combination of H3N2 and H5N1 would serve as an incubator for a hybrid virus if a person was infected, the Toronto Sun reported. Then, the virus would be able to transmit easily to and among people.

Three months later, Baxter began working with WHO on a vaccine for the new influenza virus. The vaccine “mix-up” was not the first time Baxter became a name mired in shoddy health procedures that put other people’s lives in danger.

During the 1970’s and early 1980’s an estimated 6,000 to 10,000 hemophiliacs in the United States and Japan became infected with H.I.V. when they received tainted clotting substance made by Baxter.

But Baxter is not the only pharmaceutical company standing to make a profit from the sales of anti-flu medicines that will be distributed in Western countries.

Industry analysts are predicting that companies like UK’s own GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) will make £1 billion ($1.6 billion) from the sales of A/H1N1 vaccines.

“Swine flu is going to be positive for the performance [of the company], but only because we have put ourselves in a position to do it,” Andrew Witty, GSK’s chief executive, said.

“And we have done that by taking very significant risks over a long time, diverting a huge amount of resources to it and doing the research that nobody else has done, so I'm not going to apologize for the fact that the company is going to make a return.”

GSK has 195 million vaccine doses under contract that are scheduled to sell at £6 ($10) a dose in Western countries. One of the analysts at WestLB, Simon Mather, believes GSK will generate sales of at least £500 million ($842 million) by next January then climb to £1 billion ($1.6 billion).

GSK is getting plenty of promotion from government officials in the UK who are advocating for the distribution of anti-flu vaccines from Relenza inhaler to Tamiflu. The exposure would contribute heavily to spurring profits for the company.

The power to promote vaccine sales then financially benefit from them is a scenario where Professor Sir Roy Anderson finds himself. He sits on the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies and on the board of GSK and makes £116,000-a-year ($195,000-a-year) from the company.

The United States (US) government is also gearing-up and making provisions to tackle the threat of the new influenza A virus.  It is a familiar road once travelled before; with any luck, past mistakes won’t be repeated.

The US government in the past mobilized a mass of people to be vaccinated against swine flu with disastrous consequences. In October 1976, under Ford Administration 40 million people were vaccinated when 19-year-old Pvt. David Lewis stationed at Fort Dix, New Jersey, became ill earlier that same year. Two months later, after the vaccine campaign began, more than 30 people died and 500 people developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome, a paralyzing neuromuscular disorder possibly link to swine flu vaccine.

The demographic most at risk will receive the vaccine first. The elderly had extra immunity to the new virus. According to Reuters, in a study published in the journal Nature confirmed that the H1N1 virus is similar to the 1918 influenza strain that killed 50 million to 100 million people. Those born before 1920 still carry antibodies to the strain in their blood and their immune system remembered the childhood infection. 

Dr. Chan with WHO said children were the most vulnerable along with pregnant women and those with severe asthma, diabetes and obesity.

British researchers Matt Keeling and Thomas House used a computer model to predict the spread of the virus and said that vaccinating children would help control the spread of the pandemic.

In the US, 12,000 children will be the first to receive the vaccine for the human trial. Followed by them will be pregnant women, adults with chronic illnesses, and health-care workers according to Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Kathleen Sebelius.

The US government has spent around $1 billion on flu vaccines and has $7 billion available to purchase more vaccines or develop other pandemic countermeasures.

Five companies, including Baxter and GSK, plan to have 100 million doses of vaccine ready by mid-October and 120 million for worldwide use.

The vaccine will contain a live weakened version of the virus. The vaccine will also contain an antibacterial additive called thimerosal, which according to the National Toxicological Program causes central nervous system injury including coma and death. The study also found “statistically-significant associations between exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines before the age of 6 months and tic disorders, attention deficit disorders (ADD), and speech and language disorders.”

In another research paper titled Thimerosal VSD Study Phase I, it contended that the risk of neurological development disorders increased with more exposure.

A new drug is supposed to be tested on animals and monitored carefully before it is then used on humans. The process is intended to avoid human casualties like what happened in Poland. 21 people from a homeless centre were paid £1-£2 ($1.70-$3.40) to be tested with a conventional flu vaccine. The hapless victims were really given an anti bird-flu drug to combat H5N1 bird-flu virus. The 21 unwitting “trial subjects” later died.

The three Polish doctors and six nurses now face criminal prosecution.

The scenario described would mean legal liability could have pharmaceutical companies battling it out in court and would cause a potential loss in profits from lawsuits as a result of the possible harmful effects from the vaccines. Fortunately, for big-pharma this will not be an issue.

In July, it was announced that in a document signed by (HHS) Kathleen Sebelius that vaccine makers and federal officials will be immune from lawsuits.

Under Executive Orders already signed it would make refusal to take the vaccine result in a one-year prison term and $250,000 fine.

Executive Order 13295 HHS Kathleen Sebelius would assume the functions of the president and apprehend, detain, or conditionally release individuals to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of suspected communicable diseases.   

 Once approval is granted by HHS, the Surgeon General has the authority to issue quarantines according to a CBS news report.

The quarantines are limited to diseases listed in presidential executive orders. Because this new virus has left scientists “baffled” because it is a “never seen before and “novel” virus, quarantines will be permitted for this virus under Executive Order 13375 signed by former President George W. Bush due to the Executive Order having a provision for novel viruses.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates is considering a proposal that would allow the military task force under direction of US Northern Command to work along with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to set up regional teams to help civilian authorities in the event of a significant outbreak.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. might also play a part in helping with the vaccination campaign. Representatives from the company have discussed with US health officials the likelihood of establishing vaccination sites at some stores for the inoculation campaign in case of an outbreak.

Meanwhile, back in the UK, the phones at NHS Direct will be heavily manned now that Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson has announced the agency needs to prepare for 65,000 deaths based on an “assumption” calculated from questionable arithmetic.

The callers will be able to answer questions from operators about their illness. If their answers “suggest” they’re stricken with swine flu, the operators will prescribe Tamiflu for them without seeing a doctor.

The A/H1N1 threat, whether real or imagined, has given rise to global government mobilization and requires all citizens to comply in hope for a return to normalcy later. WHO is requesting that governments take preventive measures and do for private citizens what they can’t do for themselves without sufficient resources.

The measures that governments are taking with the pharmaceutical companies are either for the good of their respective countries—or have underlying conditions.

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The UN Undermines Peace For Palestinians

Deciphering The Media’s Disinfo On The Middle East
By Jamaal Long

It is unforgivable. It is unconscionable. But, because it is the United Nations—it wasn’t unforeseeable.

So, it was not surprising that after a UN investigation into the attacks on Gaza, which started on Dec. 27, 2008, and ended Jan. 18, will yield no prosecutions of war crimes.    

BBC news reported that Israeli military says that their internal investigation showed that a few errors occurred, but they acted lawfully.

These errors included shooting an elderly woman who came within a 100 yards of a commandeered house.

“What’s great about Gaza?” an Israeli squad commander said when asked by the New York Times, “You see a person on a path, he doesn’t have to be armed, you can simply shoot him. In our case it was an old woman . . . the order was to take down the person, this woman, the minute you see her.”

Three teenage brothers of the al-Attar family told The Guardian, a British newspaper, that they were used as human shields to clear buildings. They were made to go into areas before the Israeli soldiers did in order for the bullets to hit the young boys first.

Nothing was off limits for the soldiers attacking Gaza.

And the Israeli weaponry was gruesome. 16 Medics and ambulance drivers were killed as they tried to attend to the wounded. One of the tanks that was used against the paramedics had a shell filled with 8,000 metal darts.

BBC News reported that there was "indisputable evidence of the widespread use of white phosphorus." And according to the Guardian, the use of white phosphorus was indiscriminate over a civilian population which is a violation of international law.

The effects from White phosphorus are devastating.  The Guardian stated that White phosphorus burns on contact with oxygen and causes deep burns when it touches human skin, sometimes reaching to the bone.

Yet, in spite of evidence that war crimes were committed, the UN will do nothing. And the world looks away. There will be no shirts across college campuses in America adorning a “free Gaza” message like the other heavily promoted, celebrity driving campaigns.

Gaza isn’t that popular.

In America, the people get their cue from their misleaders on whom to feel sympathy for. When politicians and journalist take aim at the subject of Gaza or Muslims, they are completely off target.
 
Quite often in political speeches and editorials when the Muslim-Israel conflict is discussed Muslims are depicted as anti-Semitic. It is a fallacious statement considering Arabic is a Semitic language; therefore, Muslims cannot be anti-Semitic. That is equivalent to an American saying they hate England then being accused of being anti-English.

One of the most outrageous statements, which was recently said in Obama’s Cairo and AIPAC speech, was Palestine doesn’t  recognize Israel’s right to exist. This is misleading on two fronts. First: Palestine is made up of predominantly Sunni Muslims that follow Islam which teaches that Jews are the “people of the book.” Second: What goes largely unreported in the media is that the State of Israel is a young country. It is even younger than the United States. Israel didn’t come into existence until May 14, 1948.

Palestinians on the other hand, are the descendants of the Canaanites. The historic region of Palestine covered over 10,000 square miles. The word Palestine came from the Greek word “Philistia” to recognize the land of the Philistines who occupied modern day Tel Aviv-Yafo and Gaza during 12th century BC.

Around 2nd century BC, Palestine came under Roman Rule when Pompey the Great conquered the land for the Roman Empire. During this time Judea was named Syria Palaestinia.

At the conclusion of the Byzantine-Ottoman wars, Ottoman came out the victor and ruled over the Palestinians until the summer of 1918 when Palestine came under the rule of the British Empire.

To Britain, it was crucial to maintain an alliance with the Ottoman Empire because peace with them ensured their trade routes from India across the Ottoman land. But when the Ottoman Empire started collapsing during the World War I, the Ottomans sided with the Germans. The British countered by promising the indigenous Arabs independence if they aligned themselves with British against the Ottomans.

As early as 1915, the British had entered into three separate agreements that would ultimately decide the fate of Palestine. One of the agreements was with the French; one was with the Sharif Hussein leader of the Arab Revolt, and the other was with Lord Rothschild leader of the Zionist movement in Britain.

The Zionist, believing they had more sway, began urging United States Congress to recognized the British mandate over Palestine, which ensured the Zionist right to the land.

After being pressured into a response, the British released a “white paper” that became the official explanation of the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was named after Lord Balfour British foreign secretary to Lord Rothschild.  

The white paper proclaimed that the Jewish people and the Palestinians had a claim to Palestine and the Jewish people did not need permission to occupy the land in that region. But that was not enough for the Zionist who wanted more.

In 1942, at the Bitlmore Hotel a conference was held that pushed the Zionist agenda onto the international scene. Their plan now was for establishing a Jewish homeland.

Less than two years later, United States Congress passed a joint resolution backing the Bitlmore program. In November 1947, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 181 which resembled the Zionist plan crafted at the Biltmore Hotel conference.

A year later on May 14, Al-Nakbah, Palestine’s catastrophic destruction was complete. Palestinians become the “other section of the population.” Palestinians became the new Native Americans and Gaza became their trail of tears. They became the new African slave on a 360-square-mile plantation. They became the new—Jew—at the mercy of their occupiers.

Palestinians—people in modern day society where no attention is paid, no truth of their struggle spoken—and still—no justice rendered.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel's Savage Attack on the Sabbath

State-backed terrorism back fires
By Jamaal Long

 
Beit Hanoun, an area near northern Gaza Strip, has been a launching ground for cross-border rockets. It is from this location that rockets have claimed the lives of two sisters while they were taking out the trash.

Across the border in Ashdod an Israeli woman darts from her car in search of shelter after hearing a siren sound. As she was making her get away, she tripped and fell in street and was killed by a rocket.

The three victims are related not only because they were senselessly murdered, but also because they are victims of their States’ foreign policy plans that involves supporting groups that the States now have to protect them from.

“The student of history may at this point note that during the 1970s and much of the 1980s, Israeli defense officials, keen to foster a faith-based counterweight to the Marxist ideology of hardline armed groups such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, quietly but crucially aided the leaders of the Gaza branch of the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood - a group which, six days after the eruption of the first Palestinian uprising, was to found the Islamic Resistance Movement, whose acronym was Hamas," Haaertz.com    
reported

To take on their opposition in other countries, States have found it convenient to eliminate their enemies by proxy, even if it means supporting violent radical groups.  In the case of Middle Eastern violence that the post-9-11-generation is all too aware of, it is not just a simple case of “them bad us good.”

The groups that we see today, Hamas in particular, was born out of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was started in the 1920s under British colonial rule. The American Conservative reported that the Muslim Brotherhood was set up in order to keep the Egyptian nationalism and anti-colonialism under wraps.
 
They also went on to report that Robert Dreyfuss author of Devil’s Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam, described the original Muslim Brotherhood as an “unabashed British intelligence front.” Even their mosque that served as their first headquarter in Ismailia, Egypt, was built by the (British) Suez Canal Company.


In 1954, Gamal Abdel Nasser became the second President of Egypt. Nasser encouraged anti-colonial and pan-Arab revolutions and took part in the founding of Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)
.


Israel, like the British, was also interested in keeping Arab nationalism in line, so 1967 Muslim Brotherhood activist were freed from Egyptian prison after the Brotherhood tried to assassinate Nasser. One of the men freed was Ahmed Yassin—founder of Hamas.


That same year concluded the Six Day War and Israel began managing the West Bank, Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula and urged the recently freed Brotherhood activists to establish themselves in Palestinian society.

The Islamic Association was set up 1973 by Ahmed Yassin, and according to The American Conservative, was licensed by Israel 10 years earlier. The Executive Intelligence Review reported that former Ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer was reported to have said that it was Israel’s idea to promote the “Islamic Movement.”

Kurtzer said when the Islamic movement began to take off, "Israel perceived it to be better to have people turning toward religion rather than toward a nationalistic cause [the Palestinian Liberation Organization—ed.]."

Hamas, Harafat al-Muqawama Al-Islamiyya, or Islamic Resistance Movement began in 1987, and between Ahmed Yassin’s release in 1967 to Hamas’s beginning, the number of mosques tripled from 200 to 600.

According to the Executive Intelligence Review, former Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir and Yitzhak Rabin admitted, in the presence of Egyptian President Muhammad Hosni Mubarak, to giving money to these mosques.

Martha Kessler, a senior analyst for the
CIA, said, “[W]e saw Israel cultivate Islam as a counterweight to Palestinian nationalism.”


AMERICA JOINS THE FRAY AND FUELS THE FLAMES

The United States supplies more than $2 billion a year in military aid to Israel. That blood money allows Israel to purchase bunker-buster-missiles, called GBU-39, which is then used to continue to kill off more Palestinians

In what would under normal circumstances seem like a blatant double cross, the US and Israel intelligence has been arming Fatah the largest faction of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to now neutralize Hamas.

Abu Abdullah, a senior member of Hamas' military wing, told World Net Daily Hamas estimates they obtained at least $400 million worth of American weapons and equipment.

Like pawns in a chess game, the US and Israeli intelligence agency have been playing both sides against each other, and with the help of US officials and the media have put out disinformation to justify aggression with Palestine.

President-elect Barack Obama in an interview July 2008, told the The New York Times that Hamas is “a group that is not representative of a nation state” and they need make a decision if it is a “serious political party seeking to represent the aspirations of the Palestinian people.”

Due to Obama’s convenient ignorance, he neglected to mention that, in Jan. 2006, Hamas won 76 of the 132 parliamentary seats, which would make them a representation of the Palestinians. He continued by stating that Hamas should “renounce violence as a tool to achieve its aims.

He should have included the same for Israel who uses Palestinians to pose as operatives of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda terrorist network. Once the collaborators working with Israel were caught one of them admitted the plan was to "discredit the Palestinian people, justify every Israeli crime and provide reasons to carry out a new (military) aggression in the Gaza Strip."

While White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe declares that Hamas has shown its "true colors as a terrorist organization, he will never talk about its true origins or a how American and Israel intelligence have used them when it was useful for them
.

Soon the young family members of the murdered Israel woman from Ashdod and the two murdered sisters from Beit Hanoun will be grown. They will be reared in an atmosphere where they have to be wary of cross-border rockets and constant threat of invasion. Soon it will be time for them to pick up weapons of their own and take revenge.

By then, the reasons behind their countries feuding won’t even be remembered
.  





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »